The hour badly spent

everything old is new again, decline of civilization, the k-state collegian is just a fancy blog, duly noted, monument to democracy, shut up college, too soapboxeyDecember 1, 2008 8:08 pm

Mark Erbacher believes that memorizing Revolutionary War documents makes one person more American than others.

As U.S. citizens, we feel we are well versed in our nation’s history and knowledgeable of its laws and practices. However, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute recently found - for the third year in a row - that a great number of Americans know very little about this nation’s history and government workings.

According to americancivicliteracy.org, of the over 2,500 randomly selected Americans who took the 33-question test, 1,700 failed. The average score was a depressing 49 percent. Possibly even more frightening is the average score of the elected officials that were surveyed: 44 percent. That means, of course, that the average person, according to this quiz, is actually more versed in American history and the government than those they have chosen to speak for them.

Eh. Once the "No Child Left Behind" generation grows up, those test scores should fly as high as a bald eagle. Of course this means once we have enough smarties we can take them off the endangered species list and hunt them in defense of our 2nd Amendment rights.

Some of the results are simply awe striking. More than twice as many people knew that Paula Abdul is a judge on American Idol than knew that the quote “government of the people, by the people, for the people” is taken from President Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, that, coincidentally, President-elect Barack Obama quoted in his acceptance speech.

Is this surprising? Paula Abdul has been fine since the 80s. "Of the people, by the people, for the people" has not characterized government in at least eight years. God damn America.

Almost 40 percent of people surveyed believe that the president has the right to declare war, when he or she doesn’t. Of those elected officials who took the quiz, 30 percent were unaware that “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” are inalienable rights referred to in the Declaration of Independence. Also, 20 percent of these same elected officials thought the Electoral College was established to supervise the first presidential debates.

That’s quite a bit of information. Gee, I wonder where he’s going with all this.

I might be biased; I am, after all, a political science major and have studied a lot of these things more than most, but these results absolutely terrify me.

Part of me thinks my life would be much easier if Mark Erbacher was the standard by which my intelligence was measured. Think it’s tougher than going up against a fifth-grader.

So America, do us all a favor: pick up a newspaper, or a book for that matter, and learn something.

Whatever; books are for coastal liberal elites, like Erica Hateley. Presumably, many of us are reading your column. It might be helpful, therefore, to explain in an entertaining way, what your field of study (lol political "science") actually is and what sort of interesting useful reaganisms you learned in civics this week. Conversely, supercilious gasbaggery really won’t do us any good.

[K-State Collegian]

your prose is too prolix, everything old is new again, ivory tower, creative underclass, femiladyism, hip to be square, janice radwayNovember 20, 2008 12:40 pm

The “zine;” what is it? What’s it for? Trite questions, to be sure. Janice Radway’s presentation, "Zines: Then & Now" and the zines’ role in grrl culture, was not so much concerned with answering the questions, instead choosing to pose the inquiry over and over again in compoundingly confusing ways.

It was hot and crowded in there, at 4pm in Union 212; several servicey tipsters pointed out that, as part of their ongoing asault on fun, womens’ studies majors showed up at Radway’s lecture for class credit. The more the merrier!

Her lecture, nominally about something fun and zany, immediately descended into a turgid academic tarpit. "Zining is nothing if not generative." "Zines were involved quite literally in the practice of utopian social construction." "The self constructed within the zine is an intersubjective self."

At first I was afraid; I was petrified. Well, I was anxious. There was barely any time to write this stuff down, let alone take a second and contemplate wtf she just said. But maybe you’re not supposed to. Maybe you’re just supposed to sit back and let the lecturer’s dodecasyllabic prose colonise your mind, coil around your neurons until you’re a theory drone worshipping the Hive Queen. As the minutes ticked by, it felt like my theory-induced trance was indeed bringing me closer and closer to a useful truth: Go to sleep, you’re not actually missing much.

A trite criticism, to be sure. Professor James Machor, at the reception, pointed out that this is necessary of academic work, this translation of ‘low culture’ into ‘high culture.’ Fine and dandy, but this feels kinda pervey and voyeuristic, like a tourist lost on the wrong side of town. The translation robs the zine (and any underground culture) of an essential element: it’s zingy voice, its undergroundey soul. Without capturing this, any attempt to convey wtf a zine is will falsify its findings.

What were the findings?

1. Riot grrls.

2. "Zining is nothing if not generative." People read a zine and react by making another zine. Kind of like blogging.

3. "MySpace and Friendster are very interesting permutations of wht zines were about."

4. The social activity of circulation and citation is at least as important to zining as the material, reified zine. Kind of like life.

5. Zinesters are primarily upper-middle class white kids. Like hippies! And hipsters! And hip-ocrites (see what I did there?)!

Later, Professor Machor asked me what I thought of a so-called progressive, underground movement being confined to said demographic (whites). I’m sure he meant well, but I had other things to think about. Like what’s going up on my next ZineSpaceBookster!

great moments in journalism, everything old is new again, god is extra dead, self-referential, fucking thursdays, shut up kansas, echo chamber of madness, hall of mirrors, laramie projectOctober 2, 2008 1:54 pm

Another reason to see The Laramie Project.

Led by Rev. Fred Phelps, supporters of Topeka’s Westboro Baptist Church plan to protest the Friday and Saturday night productions of The Laramie Project at K-State.

Ten years ago, Phelps also showed up at [Matthew] Shepard’s funeral.

“We do a reenactment of a Phelps scene in the play,” [Ariane] Chapman said. “It’s interesting that he’s a character in the play and he’s picketing the play,” she added.

In ten years someone will write another play about Phelps picketing a play in which Phelps pickets a funeral. Then Phelps will picket that, and another actor will show up to picket Phelps’ picketing, and then the universe will finally and instantaneously implode only to be replaced by something even more bizarre and self-referential, a universe in which homosexuals have written the Bible, God is a troupe of travelling actors, and all records of the whole thing are just an echo chamber of hyperlinks leading back and forth between each other, starting with this blog. Thanks to Phelps THE HOUR BADLY SPENT WILL BE THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE!! Until the whole implosion thing happens again. I have nothing to do with that.

[Source: K-State Collegian]

livejournaley, hell is other people, everything old is new again, word vomit, cherry bomb, last night's party, self-referential, oversharing, modern romance, passive-aggressive notes, hipsters can't love, hipster elf, microfeud, blog warsSeptember 28, 2008 9:52 pm

Did you ever go to one of those parties thrown in honour of a certain special someone and there’s a cake and everything and you get there early so you’re waiting for people to show up and then some people actually do come by and then someone hands you a sheet of paper and you realize the guest of honor died exactly a year ago and that what you’re reading — what you will be reading aloud — is a list of happy memories written out by his family? Never went to one of those? First time for everything. Mine was Friday. It felt awkward for me at first in an I-never-knew-Michael-so-maybe-I-shouldn’t-be-reading-this kind ofway, but at least there was cake and everything actually turned into an hour well spent.

I started out, for no reason at all, not in the best of moods. Pile that on with the fact that sometimes Cherry goes into this temper wherein, any time someone opens his mouth, she has to let him know how pompous he is ("You think you’re so witty:" the refrain every time I make some dumb pun). Yes, "him," because she only does it with dudes, and only as long as the dude isn’t Asian. It seems appropriate if you’re trying to stop some chronic ass from giving his tiresome Art Speech, but tonight it’s just Jordan trying to amuse some party guests. I can’t really figure out why this irks Cherry to the point that she has to snipe at him every five minutes (Jordan’s either got a lot of patience or an ENORMOUS shlong or maybe both), and I don’t really feel like being in anybody’s crosshairs, so I just shut up and listened, for once.

I often do that (shut up and listen) better when I avoid looking at the person talking; a little like closing your eyes to really savor a whiff of some nice perfume. So when Cate talks I zone out and gawk at a spot on the concrete, but I can totally hear all sorts of rhythm and inflection that I never noticed before because Ariana always steals the having-cute-speech-patterns thunder. Later the Hipster Elf will say I "looked like I was a million miles away."

I wasn’t, but I was kind of upset about having come across this two hours before, which I suppose is what I get for looking at LiveJournal. Yes, I "screwed somebody and it ended poorly" (when doesn’t it?); so poorly, in fact, that I was really looking forward to not having to talk about it ever again with anybody, ever.

Then there’s the other thing. "Disgustingly self-absorbed couple?" I could maybe handle "Most Annoying English Major Couple," but something about "disgustingly self absorbed" just doesn’t sit right. It makes it seem as though we wait for a crowd to gather and then start humping each other or something, the whole time laughing about how awesome and edgy we are. So. While I was (or wasn’t) a million miles away, I thought about what it’s like to be "disgustingly self-absorbed;" to the extent that the people in a pair technically kind of have to be disgustingly into each other (or else there’s no couple), well, I guess "disgustingly self-absorbed" really is accurate, although just "They Make a Cute Couple; Too Bad About His Face" would be more accurate, and "The S&M Jokes Aren’t Fooling Anyone; We All Know He’s A Fucking Pansy" would hit veeeeery close to home, leaving a welt in my psyche much like that time the Hipster Elf put on those high heels and that leather mask with the zipper in front where a mouth should be, and gave me 40 lashes with a lace flail. I asked Jen Roberts about proper titles at the Kathouse, after Sugi’s reading last week.

"Now that I came here with the Hipter Elf I’m worried about us being the Most Annoying English Major couple."

"Oh don’t worry about it. Everyone in the department is hitched."

Hm. Hitched is being a "couple" in the same way Infinite Jest is "a book."

"But those are actual, like, professors, like Reckling and Kimball. What about, you know, shlubs?"

There are, indeed, many grad student couples — Jen named some people I’d heard of and a bunch of others I hadn’t. Undergrads don’t really count, so I guess I’m off the hook. Although the Man Who Travels With Jen is a townie and not a student, he’s actually met every author that’s come through town, making him a better English major than I am.

Anyway. Then there’s the other thing: there is no "cluster-fuck of understanding" around me. Yes, I am reserved and shy and hardly ever share personal bullshit, but someone who really wanted to "understand" "me" (for the record, I’m really not that interesting) would have to accept that trait of mine, not declare war on it. And I have a feeling it’s not me that she wants understanding on but rather how much does that terse hookup way back in January have to do with how she and I feel about each other now? Let’s face it: thinking about that is kind of a huge downer. So don’t. Just read some cheesy Blink-182 lyrics (in a pinch can just say you were doing it Ironically) and have a drink.

Last year there’s no way I would have been at a party like this. Like, I’d have called someone, and I’d have gotten "you wouldn’t like it very much," or "I’d bring you along, but it’s not really my party," or some other code for "you’re not cool enough" or "Cherry is kinda on a date and wouldn’t it be weird if you came along, ha ha ha, kthxbai." Tonight is different. For them, nominally at least, it is about Michael; for me it is a gift from friends. I sit back and enjoy it. Then I trace circles on Hipster Elf’s right knee and make googly eyes at her. Ariana makes a face like she’s about to vomit, but she doesn’t really mean it.

everything old is new again, decline of civilization, collegianism, femiladyism, the k-state collegian is just a fancy blog, shut up kansas, fixating on sex, convulsive hand-wringing, imagine my painSeptember 17, 2008 3:18 pm

Whenever you go to the mall, you should just buy condoms along with everything; that gaudy purse, those shoes, that snazzy Sprint cellphone, those jeans. Especially if they’re Levi’s. That brand is just WAY TOO SEXY, according to Corene Brisendine.

On a scale of inappropriateness, sex in advertising has reached an all-time high.

At the movie theater or on prime-time television, consumers can watch a Levi’s Jeans commercial in horror.

The girl on screen appears to be between 12 and 14. She unbuttons her jeans and encourages a boy to do the same in an attempt to get him to do something he is not sure about.

It promotes not only teen sex but also the ideology that young girls must aggressively seek sex to be popular or liked by boys. The popularity this type of behavior promotes is not the type young women should be seeking.

Corene sounds like a lot of fun at parties.
Girls who behave in this manner will never find boys who like them for more than sex or who want to be with them for any length of time [ed. Note: FIND THE RIGHT BOY!!]. Advertisers are absolutely wrong for promoting it.
I’d say advertisers have done a good job. I own 700 Snorg Tees. Thanks, by the way, for "promoting" the "ideology" that all boys are always predatory, infantile jerks.

Why must sex be painted as some sort of automatic loss for girls? Isn’t it possible for a girl to get something out of it too? Is it possible for her to indicate so, by yelling "I win I win I win!" during orgasm?

Music videos are another form of advertising that have hit an all-time high of inappropriate dress and behavior. For example, Rihanna’s song "Disturbia" was enjoyable when it first came out.

However, after watching the music video of a woman dressed in a prostitute’s outfit, complete with fishnet pantyhose and a corset, it makes me sick to hear it.

It makes you sick? It’s a woman in skimpy clothes, not a crime scene. Haven’t rap/R&B videos looked exactly like this for the last 20 years? I haven’t seen Rihanna’s, but I can’t imagine it took much work. They probably just photoshopped her head into the "Baby Got Back" video and called it a day.
This video sends the message to teenagers that women must dress and act like prostitutes to be heard and recognized. Surely women are more intelligent than this video portrays.
Do I want to be recognized just for "intelligence?" That’s hard. You have to, like, read. And solve equations. And talk a lot. Which is pretty boring. And on some level, isn’t it another form of objectification? On occasion, I kind of like to just have sex, and maybe some women do too. Is that wrong? Taking my shirt off and making sexy dance moves is a lot easier than giving an art speech.

[Source: K-State Collegian]

newsworthy, everything old is new again, collegianism, not afraid to be servicey, femiladyismSeptember 12, 2008 3:04 am

Chivalry: what exactly the hell is up with it? Any mention of it invariably takes the tone of "it’s dead" or "it’s dying." Katie Morford examined it in a feature for the Collegian.

"For me, chivalrous actions could never die out," said a K-State sophomore. "Only the definition of the acts change[s]."

True chivalry still exists on our campus, particularly in different student groups that promote it among members. The K-State chapter of FarmHouse Fraternity, founded in 1921 as an agricultural club, is known on campus for its chivalrous men.

"We emphasize that for true chivalry to occur, one must not separate the social aspect from the moral aspect," said a FarmHouse representative. "Farmhouse has established its reputation for being gentlemen as a result of its foundation in Biblical truths."

Biblical truths? Does it really take that much effort? No, according to a separate editorial that ran in the same paper (this is obviously a huge issue round these parts).

The best way to do this is pretty simple. Guys, open the door for the girl behind you on your way to the dining hall; hold the elevator for the girl racing to make it to her first class, and when the gal behind you at Wal-Mart only has her ‘10 item or less’ armful, let her jump ahead of you and your overflowing basket of Gatorade and fruit snacks. Do the little things that make life less of a hassle. It doesn’t take much effort to be polite.

Good advice. I didn’t care much, however, for the way the piece began.

Chivalry is not dead, but it is dying.

It’s sad to think about how uncommon it is, and if it keeps up at the rate it’s falling, it’ll be gone like a rabbit being chased by a couple of basset hounds. But we must not let chivalry slip away from us as easily as the terrified hare. We must work to keep chivalry alive and thriving.

Who brings this stuff up? I can’t say I’ve really ever heard a woman complain about doors not being held, etc. I’m not saying they don’t have grounds for complaint (I’m also not saying that they do, for that matter); I just can’t imagine that it’s really such a huge issue.

Rigorous "debates" over whether chivalry is "dead" or "dying" or "being chased by a couple of basset hounds" are largely just an excuse for middle-class conservative twits to fall all over each other pointing out how each guy is THE LAST IN THE WORLD to actually hold the door or pick up the check. Clearly this is proof of the deep, abiding respect with which women are cherished, especially if this mindset extends to abortion rights. Or the prosecution of rape. Or whether you guffawed when your dad called Hilary Clinton a cunt, then you repeated the "joke" to your friends.

We like to romanticize the past as being full of knightly men so gallant that all women felt empowered, held their heads high when they walked into a room (someone held the door for them), and never had to worry about intimidation, harassment, or violence. If this is not a hazy legend, if it is indeed true, why has it been so easily forgotten? Backlash to modern feminism? Okay, getting off my soapbox now so someone else can enlighten me.

[Source: K-State Collegian]

livejournaley, hell is other people, everything old is new again, word vomit, cherry bomb, winter of our discontent, epistolary, facebook, sonnet 30, losing friends and alienating people, modern romance, saucy aussie, tmi, blogsome nymphet, passive-aggressive notes, hipsters can't love, this blog is not deadAugust 25, 2008 1:14 pm

I knew, after our talk, during Friday’s annoyingly poetic thunderstorm, that eventually you would get bored or curious and click on that link (I don’t mind that anyone finds it; it’s right out there in the open on my Facebook profile). Then you would read back and see "how I really felt," how childish and petty I really was, how prostrating and selfish I really was, how arrogant and judgemental I really was, how lonely and bitter and embarrassed I really was, but mostly how drunk I really was.

So I knew you would find The Hour Badly Spent and that you would tear through all those posts, and I thought of how easy it would be to just make them private, but then why did I put them there in the first place? Also: I am extremely lazy, so much so that I can’t even be bothered with extra mouse clicks. Also: it’s not really a big deal anyway. Nobody reads this shit except for a few people to whom I’ve given obnoxious nicknames [ed. note: I’m tired of trying to amuse my readers — all 3 of them — with with creative monikers. We’ll be on a first name basis. Except for Professor Potts and Doctor Dodd, because that sounds like they teach at Hogwarts. And Doctor Hately. She went on and on about how hard she studied for that title, la dee da, and if the rest of us don’t damn well recognize or whatever, she is not afraid to shank us. Then she downed a shot of Vegemite with horseradish and yelled "Huzzah, beehotch!" at Princess Glitter Bunny, which was utterly terrifying but also kind of hot*].

This stupid blog was not meant to be some sort of cudgel. So, about all those verbal swipes; umm, my bad. Skimming back through them, I’m actually terribly embarrassed. They weren’t really about you; they were about me: a tabloidey chronicle of what the f, exactly, I am doing here, because otherwise I’ll forget. And if now, I am sometimes disturbingly quiet, it is not because of you or any you-and-me stuff. I had a pretty bad summer, during which I made a terrible mistake and now I’m a thousand miles away and cannot fix it. I don’t mean to play the mystery man but I also really don’t want to talk about it. However, it’s on my mind a lot, and at times it will make me kind of withdrawn and surly until I can think of a witty declaration of some sort, which will usually come in the form of a Russian reversal ("In Russia, declaration think of YOU!"), because those are cheap and easy. Everybody knows how I feel about cheap and easy.

Anyway. So. Not to be all "the only emperor is the emperor of ice cream" over this but it really is all kind of old. A month in blog time is like two years of reality. I’ve aged TEN YEARS since, you know, back then. Which makes me forty-fucking-six. And not to diminish what happened, either, because we did, in fact, have a good time.

It was a good time because you took me to Lawrence in the winter, which was beautiful and white everywhere, and to that party full of Lawrence hipsters — who are much better than Manhattan hipsters because in Lawrence their dresses are smaller. It was a good time because of that morning we laughed together for five straight hours, even though I know you are not that funny and neither am I. It was a good time because we drank way too much and spent nights together and all that other stuff, and perhaps there was just not enough "other stuff" but whatever; you get the point.

Let this be the last of these pretentious livejournal-ish rants of mine. And I’ll try to cool it on the Sonnet 30 references. The Collegian is out! Let’s go make fun of it. And maybe while I’m at it I’ll write more coherently.


*This never actually happened. But it definitely should have because isn’t it awesome? Plus you can totally picture it.

livejournaley, everything old is new again, drive it like you stole it, going native, blogsome nymphet, this is dumb, i'm back, this blog is not deadAugust 22, 2008 11:56 pm

As we float towards autumn I can’t help but be reminded of that feeling of being newly in love. The whole world is so beautiful, everything a delight. Winter snow feels like warm summer nights; every outing precious and magical. Even every second you spend alone is surging and overflowing with anticipation, for that next time you meet.

It’s like that night she was in your car, that old 95 Mitsubishi, driving up through the hills with the windows down and the radio way up, and you pretended to sing along to punk rock songs you didn’t know just to impress her. And maybe it worked, because she didn’t mind one bit when you put your hand on her thigh; you even thought you could see her blushing and trying to hide it. Or maybe you were still too shy to touch her but she gave you that look, when you dropped her off, that smile both happy and not really innocent, and you told yourself next time you shouldn’t be so shy.
 
No, I’m not dating anyone. I’m just back in Manhattan, that’s all.

everything old is new again, collegianism, ain't nothin like the real thing baby, the k-state collegian is just a fancy blog, romeo & julietMay 5, 2008 4:09 pm

There has apparently been some sort of show running at Nichols for almost two weeks; Little Red Romeo & Juliet or something. I guess it’s such a big deal that the Collegian did a little write-up on it.

It included a profile of Romeo’s actor. "The roles he has played in the past have been more aggressive, and Romeo’s character is exceedingly vulnerable."

"I bring passion to the table," he said. "The role calls for a lot of passion, and I’m a hopeless romantic." More or less the same as every other handsome, slender, chiselled, actor-type I envy.

Juliet’s actress also got some inches. "I’m usually in musicals, and Juliet’s role is serious and emotional. She was sad, in love, frightened, angry and happy throughout the show. The range is so much broader than any other emotional range I’ve had to go through in a show before."

"Her character’s only 13 and I’m 21. I didn’t want to come off as too old." Ergo, she took Teddy Ruxpin with her on stage, a fact that the article seemed to omit.

Also omitted: everything else that happened on the stage. Fighting. Dancing. Tybalt’s outfit. Mercutio. MERCUTIO, dammit! We already know Romeo and Juliet are characters in this thing, because we read the title repeatedly, sounding it out very slowly, rolling the R’s and softening the vowels so they swim up and down in the air. Also, because everyone knows they’re in it. Everyone also knows fervor and emotion overtook the stage as Romeo enveloped Juliet’s face in his hand, tenderly kissing her as he gazed desperately into her eyes and recited the classically romantic verses that symbolize infatuated young love.

That harlequin-romance prose is in the brochures. Apropos of nothing, I have no idea what a Harlequin romance is, because I’ve never read any romance novels, not that I know it’s a brand of romance novels or anything. So how could Jenna Scavuzzo discuss the event and NOT MENTION any fabulosity particular to the performance (I’m looking at you, Mercutio). Could it be that she didn’t even see the performance at all? In that case, nice touch with the "gazed desperately into her eyes," but that doesn’t sound like Shakespeare’s style.

livejournaley, everything old is new again, last night's party, decline of civilization, you so missed the point, pretentious literary douchebag, ivory tower, amused at my own shitty jokes, required reading, i hate everybodyApril 29, 2008 2:48 am

The Frowny Townie texted me late last night, urging me to come to Auntie Mae’s to celebrate the waning hours of her 22nd birthday. When I arrived, she was sitting at a booth, across from a guy named Johann, who was not saying a thing. Seriously, he placed himself just so the light could cast dark circles under his eyes, and spent all night sitting there and looking menacing while Frowny Townie talked.

And talked.

And talked.

That girl can fit the word "I" into a single sentence 58,000 times. Is this what passes for conversation these days? But with charmingly brooding fellows like Johann - good for nothing except inarticulate indifference - I guess it’s the best anyone can hope for.

Ever and anon more of her friends trickled in. Her brother. Her brother’s girlfriend, Caitlin. Jen. Jessica. Cassandra. Michael. They all sort of segmented off, not bothering to say hi to anyone they didn’t know. If she remembered to, Frowny Townie occasionally introduced people, but what’s the point; why introduce me to people who will neither talk to me nor remember my fucking name? Then they even actually migrated to the next booth and ignored the people left at mine. Exclusion is the new inclusion. I tried striking up a conversation with Johann; what’s your major, how do you know The Frowny Townie, what else can you do, but he just grunted and looked sullen. Why do people come out to bars if they’re just going to sit there and sulk? But at least he had the polite inertia to sit across from me. No one else even looked in my direction. Even when I stood there and said something like "Hi, I’m The Hour Badly Spent, how are you?" Nothing. As if a joke just flew over their heads.

These are annoyingly young snerts. Try introducing yourself to one and you get a cattlesque stare, a neutron star of civility. Try to strike up a conversation and they whip out cellphones to text-message old boyfriends. No wonder I feel all stabby whenever I hang out with people. For the longest I thought it was because I was somehow repulsive and inept, but no; it’s because they actually do just plain suck.

Whatever. I decided to sit back and see where their conversations led them. Frowny Townie and Ryan, my RA, swapped judgements on their classes. Ryan has taken American Survey courses; Frowny Townie has taken the British ones. I haven’t taken either yet, so I listened closely to those two, and actually learned some things in the process.

I had hoped that British Survey 2 would talk about some 20th century authors, like Dylan Thomas, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, et cetera. But the course is apparently full of Victorian Lit, which Frowny Townie seems to be convinced is somehow relevant and "cool." Get the knack. Victorian everything is depressing. Nobody looks back on those good ol’ days fondly. George Eliot went out of style before your great-grandparents were born. Unfortunately, my only other option is American Survey; I would rather take a bath in a blender than slog through Moby Dick. So Charlotte Bronte, pucker up.

The subject of religion came up. Jessica chimed in, with an excitingly subversive syllogism to share.

"If you’re a Catholic priest, then you’re married to God. Therefore, God is gay."

Ryan took it and ran with it. "No, God loves everyone. He’s bisexual!"

"No he’s not," I piped up. "My church always made it pretty clear that God hates women."

Then someone called me a misogynist.

A while ago this would have sent me into paroxysms of shame and apologies. But fuck it; I’m no longer going to cave in to someone else’s earnest, numb-skulled missing of the point. If you’re too full of your own misguided indignation to understand what a pithy, brutal assault on sun-belt religious mores actually looks like, then you’re way behind on drinks, to say the least. While I’m at it, to hell with sun-belt religious mores. Wow, that was cathartic.

Frowny Townie continued. She had this story about how it was so hawt that she made out with her gay friend! On New Year’s Eve! She repeated it every time someone came into the bar with birthday wishes. By the fiftieth time I’d heard it I called bullshit.

The Hour Badly Spent:  Nipple tweak or it didn’t happen.
Frowny Townie:            No, he didn’t touch my boobs. He’s gay.
The Hour Badly Spent:  What difference does that make?

Well, whether it happened or not, it illustrates the central problem with these kids. Out of sync with their own spirituality, no sense of responsibility, no effort to even reach out to anyone in any meaningful way, and absolutely no sense of humor. By contrast, I spent New Year’s Eve doing the same things I do every day: yoga, then the art museum, then a motivational speech to inner-city children, then the library, then volunteering at the Retarded Dolphin Conservatory. So long, and thanks for all the fish.

 

everything old is new again, cherry bomb, last night's party, decline of civilization, modern romance, blogsome nymphetApril 27, 2008 9:06 pm

Friday night at Rusty’s Last Chance, Arianna celebrated the hell out of her 21st birthday. Carolyn, Cate, Cherry, Jordan, Marco, Brandon, and Johnny all showed up to toast the occasion.

Johnny was wearing all black, with a black fedora, black leather jacket, and sunglasses. At midnight. Only complete assholes wear their shades indoors. True to form, he kept trying to grope all the single girls.

"I’m sitting over here," said Carolyn. "Don’t let him find me."
"You can’t really hide from him," I warned. He’s got special nightstalkerey powers. That’s why he’s dressed like a vampire. Who will be the next to fall for his hypnotic charm?"

At some point, after Jordan whipped out a camera, Cherry and Arianna started making out. A few seconds later, Cherry remembered the camera was still going and started getting really into it.

I’m pretty sure those two assumed this would be the highlight of everyone’s night. I, for one, still had the fabulosity of the English department - Chris Kennedy, Anne Longmuir, Erica Hateley, Tony Doerr, et al, on my mind; liquor-laced hilarity sans spectacle. Next to that, watching these annoyingly young snerts ham it up for the camera all over each others’ faces was as much fun as seeing your spaniel lick its own crotch. You take one glance and you’re like, "Muffy you are so stupid," then you go back to something more interesting, like the newspaper. Woman beats off burglar with gnome, page 8.

your prose is too prolix, everything old is new again, paper faces on parade, fucking thursdays, rhymes with leather, modern romance, romeo & juliet, grey lady, duly notedApril 25, 2008 8:37 am

So far I’ve gone to see Stop Kiss, the Modigliani String Quartet, Huck & Tom and the Mighty Mississippi, Too Many Sopranos, Brian Pemberly’s poetry reading, Dunya Mikhail’s poetry reading, Denise Lowe’s poetry reading, Allison Wallace’s memoir-reading, and lots of other fun stuff, all independent and date-less. But Thursday night’s performance of Romeo & Juliet was different. I’d been looking forward to this since last semester. I needed someone — and not just ANYONE, but someone special: another hyper-literate bastard, to sit with me and make mischief. Otherwise, the whole experience is ruined by constant thoughs of "I’m awesome and everybody else in the world missed out, because they all suck." So, Rhymes With Leather, my favorite nerd, heroically restored my faith in humanity by coming with me to this affair.

The acting was superb all-around. Notable roles:

The lanky Mercutio, of course. He swaggered around with a pimp cane and dick jokes, fucking dominating every scene in which he appeared. Pure awesomeness.

Benvolio delivered his urgent tone with a rich clarity to his voice.

Unfortunately, Romeo couldn’t accomplish this. His lines tripped out over each other at the same high speed throughout his performance; his sense of urgency overpowered, instead of underlining, his emotional expression. No joy, no despair, no delight, no pining adolescent lust, only the same homogenous desperation. Perhaps I was disinclined to like him because of his tousled hair, Ivy League chin, and piercing, intense eyes. But Rhymes With Leather didn’t seem to mind that stuff too much.

He had that kind of angsty, teen aloofness. You know? He reminded me a lot of the way that Leonard Whiting portrayed Romeo in the Franco Zeffirelli version. The fact that he was in love kind of takes over and of course he’s going to go crazy with desperation. His joy was and is Juliet, so–brace yourself–like Edward essentially can’t find his happiness without Bella, Romeo has all of his joy in Juliet. Basically there was no point in finding joy in anything else. This Romeo, I thought, handled that very well, and therefore I was pleased with his performance. He’s a teenager in love; what more can you ask for? You see that Twilight reference I slipped in?

Duly noted. Maybe she should be writing this review.

"It’s a girl thing," she explained during the post-perfomance reception, as I attentively guzzled mimosas. I see what she’s saying. And Romeo truly did a good job of body-acting; gestures, fluid grace moving across the stage — that stuff enhanced his part, and ultimately I did not dislike him.

I was originally disinclined to like Juliet solely on the basis of her pretty blonde tresses. And as The Grey Lady pointed out, Juliet held a doll with her in a lot of scenes, reminding us that she’s playing a 13-year-old, which we didn’t really want to think about. Nevertheless, it was clear early on that the actress really inhabited every scene she was in. Her voice was clear and pleading. She delivered her lines at a musical pace. Every word hung in the air, like the last line of a song refrain. And as she spoke she would move to and fro, across the stage or across the balcony, starry-eyed, clutching her hands and pivoting gracefully on her heeled shoes, putting a lot of body movement, along with the words, into delivering her character to us. Tres magnifique.

All in all, I was on the edge of my seat, the whole time, taking in every movement on the stage (some scenes had a lot of activity; fighting, dancing, more fighting. Those were a real treat) and every word that fell from everyone’s lips. I tip my hat to the pretentious bastard who actually threw the script together.

your prose is too prolix, everything old is new again, collegianism, end timesApril 5, 2008 11:09 am

I’m kind of puzzled. Former yearbook staffer and passive-aggressive gesturist Adrianne DeWeese seems to be on fire with her profile articles, artfully translating slices of someone’s life into something strikingly detailed, so that the readers get a coherent snapshot of her subject. Case and point: "Retirement community resident has seen little change by aging process," in which I found out that at 95, Helen Toburen can beat me at basketball. Whatever; I’d still win at cigarette smoking.

But why can’t looker-awayer Adrianne do the same thing with stories that are not profiles? Case and point: the first two paragraphs of "Study finds more people living to, past 100:"

A recent study suggests the compression of morbidity and compression of disability might be separate phenomena, making it easier for people to live to age 100.
Compression involves delaying morbidity or disability so it takes up a smaller percentage of a person’s total lifespan. The study was published Feb. 11 in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

By the time I finished her article, I had prostate cancer.

 

 

everything old is new again, collegianismApril 2, 2008 6:27 pm

In "Army pays professors $4.5 million to build laser," Scotty beamed reporter Corene Brisendine into the physics department to scout around for new life and new civilizations or whatever. She found a superweapon! Okay, maybe not.

"Star Trek" pushes the limits of space by "going where no man has gone before." Two K-State physics professors and an associate professor of industrial and manufacturing systems engineering are pushing the boundaries of technology by developing laser technology that might be applicable to futuristic technologies similar to those viewed on science-fiction shows like "Star Trek."

The professors are attempting to build the fastest pulsing laser in history by using attosecond optical technology based on recollision and gating, said Charles L. Cocke, university distinguished professor of physics. An attosecond is .25 billionths, billionth of a second."

In a remarkable display of self-discipline, I am carefully avoiding any "LaserCocke" jokes, which should allow me to focus more on how much of a nerd Corene is. See, nerds are meticulous, loving to do research and find out new and fascinating stuff, pondering diverse applications for new technology.
"On an episode of "Star Trek Voyager," Capt. Janeway uses a hand-held device to check if her food was edible. On another episode, a crewmember uses a device to scan a rock formation on an alien planet. Another crewmember heals an injured patient by waving a device over the patient’s forehead."
Or they bat their eyes at someone and borrow his Star Trek collection, whatever. It’s still hard work. When I went out on assignment, Adrianne also used to make us gather information with our Tricorders. I found them cumbersome, and kept mine hidden whenever I made out with hot alien chicks, which I did every episode of the third season.

livejournaley, hell is other people, everything old is new again, cherry bomb, pretentious literary douchebag, epistolary, hippies don't lie, sexy communist spy, freckle fetish, making passes at girls with glasses, oversharing, apology of sorts, losing friends and alienating people, modern romanceMarch 31, 2008 12:57 am

You somehow managed to hail mary right over my trenchant social analyses and hone in on the *other* posts. Those in which I invoke defense mechanisms and feed my delusions of grandeur with alcohol; the posts in which I am pompous, childish, desperate and whiney; petty, self-indulgent, shallow, obnoxious, and worst of all, too prolix (my bad). And in so doing you found that secret thing which unravelled me. Umm, sorry about that whole business, by the way.

And what, exactly, was it? That business?

Yes, there was a party, months ago.

She noticed me. Asked me questions. Got my jokes, even the sly, insiderey one I threw out just to see if anybody was listening. And yes, whatever, I know it was mind-numbingly awful, just like 95% of my "jokes."

Where’d my drink go?
Oh, was that yours, on the table? I finished it off. Forgive me. It was delicious; so sweet, and so cold.
I know what you’re talking about, she said, looking right at me.
Do you now? I tilted my head.

So yeah, I was weak and lonely and stupid (some things never change). One night there was a conversation. And promises.

And then, another night, she visited. Said all the right things. The sort of things you secretly always wanted someone to say to you? Those. "But how did she know?" I wondered afterward, dazed and smiling idiotically.

We partied in Lawrence one night. She invited me over some more; parties, get-togethers, studying, until by and by she didn’t. Then it was all missed phone calls, all sorts of excuses not to make dates, and then all of nothing.

As time wore on and the thing ran its course, I grew more ashamed angrier and angrier still with myself. I withdrew, even despite your kind efforts. Yours too, Sexy Communist Spy. Again, my bad.

 

In hindsight, this experience has helped me decide on something of great social imprtance which I’ve been mulling over for some time; I will no longer hit on any women under 40.

Except Dessa, of course.

livejournaley, hell is other people, your prose is too prolix, everything old is new again, kinda rambly, word vomit, last night's party, hippies don't lie, mouthpiece of the great beyond, nice ass, jump jive & wail, you got served 12:56 am

I’d been picturing this moment in my mind the second I came here and saw the band: their dark suits, their swing-dancing wingtips, the trumpet and the sax, and every time it runs through my head it goes like this:

"Hey, let’s dance."
"Whatever. I’m leaving.

But the band’s been at it for an hour, ta-tum tum ta-tum tum, and they are kicking ass, and I’m tapping my feet and swaying my head, and for some reason I got all dressed up tonight; new hairdo, favorite shoes, favorite tie, favorite shirt, and I just can not help myself. It’s now or never. I turn to Madeline and ask her.

"Oh, I have no rhythm." That’s not the point! This is Auntie Mae’s, not Soul Train.

But is this one of those times when I’m supposed to be a man and just go for it? I can never tell. So I make for her hand and she moves them both under her bottom. "No means no." Umm, it’s a dance, not a rape, but point taken.

It is never "one of those times."

She gets up to use the bathroom and while she’s gone a couple of girls walk by, going into a holding pattern right at the empty bench.

"Uh, sorry. Someone’s sitting here."
"That’s okay. I don’t want to sit there anyway." The way she says it makes the word there point at me and stick its tongue out. Saucy! As she walks away, I notice a tramp stamp: a ship’s helm (I guess it’s so the seamen know where to go).

Madeline comes back and the band is still going. The helmsgirl flutters back this way, onto the dance floor, with Jimbo (That guy knows everybody). They are dancing and the song winds down and the band announces their next one:

"This is a song by Duke Ellington. He still has it doesn’t he!" That makes one of us. I turn to Madeline again.

"Should have come here with a different girl." Duly noted.

And fifteen minutes later they start up another number, with that tempo again just right, ta-tum tum, called "Let’s drink wine." I know now if I can’t find someone to dance with me on this one I’ll be a miserable failure, sitting here with a stupid twisty hairdo and a stupid black shirt and stupid jolly-roger vans and stupid polka dot tie. I turn to the curly-haired blonde on the barstool next to me.

"Hi there. My name’s Swingie McJazzhands."
"Hi! I’m Anna."
"Nice to meet you Anna. How are you? This band is great, aren’t they?"
"Yeah, I love it."
"Would you like to dance?"
Oh, I can’t. My friend and I were waiting for someone and now we’ve gotta head out."

True to her word, they skedaddle up the stairs and out the door, presumably to a better, albeit torturously jazzless, party.

Jimbo’s on the floor with that girl again. There is exactly one other person here who I already know, and she is sitting front and center, so what the hell, might as well take another crazy chance and ask her. So I do. A moment later I take her by the hand and we start swinging and grinding like we were born for this night.

Ha ha, just kidding. She shot me down too.

everything old is new again, collegianism, not afraid to be servicey, mouthpiece of the great beyondMarch 28, 2008 3:22 pm

Earlier today, Collegian writer and looker-awayer Adrianne let us in on her favorite workout songs - angry breakup music! But who wants to think about some douchey ex while you tone up? For me, a healthy part of the grieving process is to ignore the ex and fixate on pornstars. Therefore, I’ve selected a few choice tunes which I think are better suited for pumping iron.

James Brown: "Payback"
I don’t know about you, but something about remembering to walk up to someone and kick his ass really spurs me to go that extra mile in the weight room. Plus, you know, the song is uhh, funky (I’ve gotta practice saying that right).

Duke Ellington: "Sentimental Love"
The reason I go work out in the first place is to seduce hot chicks. What does it matter if I can do so after I leave or while I’m still there? Smooth jazz puts everyone in the right mood. I hate when I sidle up to some skinny blonde Jessica or Megan with my very best line ("Baby, don’t act like you don’t remember me") and she tasers me. Who would taser me to smooth jazz?

Theme song from Terminator 2: Judgement Day
That reverb of solid metal set to a sober military rhythm reminds me of what lies in store for me, and for all mankind: watching Sarah Connor Chronicles on veoh.com. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves.

Dance Dance Revolution techno music
Because, to tell you the truth, I’m not at the gym. I’m in the Stuni game room. Playing Dance Dance Revolution.

80s Pop music.
Don’t judge me.

everything old is new again, collegianism, end times, not afraid to be servicey, gin & juice, nice assMarch 24, 2008 9:55 pm

Drinking age should span all college students. At first, I thought Aubree Casper’s op-ed piece would be shameless, thoughtless cheerleading for the cause of under-21 drinking. But she presented a persuasive, carefully researched argument, backed up by figures (plus, she’s kind of hot): the presence of a university brings people to town; if you allow more people to drink (responsibly), you could also tax their purchases and give some of that money back to the school. That way, everyone’s happy and everyone’s drunk, which makes them happier. We all win! Next round’s on you!

Aubree, I’m sure an intelligent, pretty columnist like you has no trouble obtaining cocktails when the moment is right. However, if you find yourself in dire straits, just, umm, leave me a blog comment. We’ll work something out.

On a related note, what’s with all the cute, smart women writing columns today? The Collegian is kind of making me wet. Thank goodness my martini’s still dry. If the paper hadn’t printed another preachy, unoriginal Blake Osborn column ("As college students we should heed the thrifty admonitions of older generations and not get tangled in the spending spiral that drains so many accounts"), I’d take this as a sign of the end times.

everything old is new again, decline of civilization, collegianism, not afraid to be serviceyMarch 13, 2008 12:54 pm

Blake Osborn in Students should be concerned about, fix unhealthy habits: We all spend too much time surfing the intertubes and eating pizza and it’s making us fat, unlike Blake, who “has learned how much willpower it takes to maintain a nutritious diet.”

Well, I always I worked off the calories by stumbling around hungover to class. Staggering in awkward semicircles is twice as aerobic as making a direct, efficient beeline. Other than that, this is another work of DUH brought to you by a self-promoting windbag. Why not come up with something relevant and topical for your next column? And for fitness’ sake, write it with a quill, on parchment, and then physically walk over to the newsroom and hand it in. If you send it by email, it will just go straight to your thighs.

everything old is new again, kinda rambly, college is the new high school, rhymes with leather, facebookMarch 2, 2008 8:29 pm

Potterhead: I’m having caffeine withdrawal. I saw a guy playing bagpipes today. And last week I saw a guy on a unicycle.

Too Prolix: Glad you feel better. I’m not seeing any bagpipes or unicycles here. I haven’t left my room in a month. I’m crouched in here in the same bathrobe I’ve worn for 4 days, etching emo poetry and mathematical equations on the walls. On the plus side, I think I’ve discovered hyperspace.

Potterhead: D’ya think you can forget about the emo poetry one night and totally go to the Wizard Rock Concert next Saturday at the Union? The tickets are free and you can get them at the UPC office in the Stuni. :D
Hyperspace? Cool.

Too Prolix: Why am I up so late? I’ve had coffee too! Except it wasn’t really coffee; it was vodka, the coffee of the gods! A rock concert, you say? The idea of a “concert” or a “dance” or a “get together involving music” takes me all the way back to high school, where I always used to sit on the sidelines, forlorn and miserable, looking on while all the cute girs had fun with all the guys who were more muscular and less nerdy than me, and who wants to relive aww fuck it who am I kidding - Saturday, eh? but I don’t hafta like it.

Potterhead: Not like Wizard Rock? That’s ridiculous. You have to like it because I said so.

your prose is too prolix, everything old is new again, decline of civilization, collegianism, pretentious literary douchebag, not afraid to be servicey, catch-22February 22, 2008 7:52 pm

It occurs to me that I’ve gone slack on shitpicking at this paper. I haven’t paid attention to the ambiguous headlines, the typos, and the other mediocrity on these pages. And picking on you guys always makes me feel better about myself. So without further ado:

Just kidding. There will be some ado, regarding the candidacy of Pirates and Ninjas: Elise Podhajsky’s interviews cleared a lot of things up for me. While both sides have put forth excellent candidates, and either of them will most likely reinstate the right to duel at dawn, anywhere, I’m gonna have to throw my endorsement behind the Pirates. Ninjas, although you’ve got mad skillz, your ultraconservative anti-rum rhetoric bothers me a lot. Additionally, although you believe ninjas can offer students the best security, I don’t think you’re in any position to fend off the invincible Armada. There; it’s done. Now go disembowel yourselves with honor.

No more bra-burning: Movements have progressed much since 70s. Seriously, as a reader, all the information I need is right there in the headline. Had I known that beforehand, I wouldn’t have had to snooze through "The types of organizing that typefied social and political protest in the 1960s and 1970s have been supported and sometimes supplanted by technological advances and increasingly complex cultural identities."

I say the types of organizing that typefied social and political protest included more fucking drugs, which made everything look more colorful, and color is exactly what this article needs.

K-State Rodeo starts tonight at Weber Arena
"…K-State will compete well in goat tying, barrel racing, and calf roping, and….there is a member of the team that is good at the team roping event. The girls are in really good shape as far as being where they need to be."

They sure are.

Coulter uses shock, biased language to remain in spotlight
A minor objection: Coulter hasn’t been in the spotlight for some time. Why don’t we discuss someone more immediate and relevant to K-Staters, like Brigitte Brecheisen - the Ann Coulter of this very campus? Yeah, call her out and get right up in her grill and put the smack down. What, are you scrrrd?

4 local restaurants lend support to cancer-research fundraiser

"Booyah" is the term chosen to represent the recent community effort to combat cancer, according to Amanda Keim.

Amanda’s loose, fluid writing style is a dollop of pure in-your-face exuberance, which is exactly how a word like "booyah" feels. Sort of like hearing Robocop explain nipple rings. Please Amanda, go on.

"Booyah is a term that represents feelings of euphoric celebration upon fighting through extreme adversity and overcoming daunting obstacles, and we’re using it in this context to emphasize our belief that we will conquer cancer in our time," said her source, who could barely contain his own feelings of euphoric celebration.

I think what Amanda’s trying to say is that Booyah is a knee in the gut from the floor on the chin at night sneaky with a knife brought up down on the magazine of a battleship sandbagged underhanded in the dark without a word of warning. Garroting. That’s what Booyah is, when we’ve all got to be tough enough and rough enough to fight cancer. From the hip. Get it?

everything old is new again, decline of civilization, collegianism, pretentious literary douchebagJanuary 29, 2008 7:10 am

Freshman English major douchebag columnist Blake Osborn enlightened us on the plight of our generation, cunningly pointing out that Everyone Else is a bunch of illiterate Youtubing toddlers, and we should all read more Proust or something, like he does.

“The Age of the Internet, which appears to be the new medium that has united the world blah blah blah.” Seriously: did this guy actually apply to come here, or did they just thaw him out on the 5th floor of Hale?

We know he must be, like, super-smart, because of the name dropping. Tolstoy! Fitzgerald! Hawthorne! Aristophanes! Wow! We’ve never read anything they wrote, because we’re too busy Facebooking or whatever. Then he went on talking about some “horseless carriage” thing. Then he poked us with his cane and fell asleep in his rocking chair.